Topic september 11
9/11 -- Beyond A Reasonable Doubt provides a summary of evidence from various sources against the official account of what happened on September 11, 2001. The film is assembled using clips from several other documentaries, news reels and archive footage to provide an example of the overwhelming evidence that contradicts statements made by official sources.
In 2005, a physics professor named Steven Jones published a paper of a scientific hypothesis regarding the free-fall speed collapse of 3 buildings on September 11, 2001--the twin towers, and the collapse of World Trade Center building 7 which was not hit by a plane. He proposed based on obvious observations of the collapse, alongside direct evidence of the use of incendiaries, that the only way for all buildings to have collapsed the way they did was in a controlled demolition of some kind. Faced with scientific evidence challenging official reports, what ensued was a firestorm--Jones received hate mail, threats, muddled media attention, and even offers of bribes to stop his research. Why was this information so thoroughly resisted? And why such scientific evidence ignored and further inquiry suppressed?
Improbable Collapse focuses on the events of September 11, 2001 from a scientific perspective--testing various hypotheses against gathered evidence such as traces of incendiary particles in dust found after the attacks; the presence of molten-metal being found in all 3 buildings (WTC 1, 2, and 7) and other physical evidence such as the collapse of all 3 buildings at free-fall speed that would suggest that they were destroyed using explosives in a controlled demolition--especially building 7 which was not hit by a plane and collapsed neatly in it's own footprint at 5:21pm. Using photographs, extensive video footage as well as thorough scientific analysis, the film comprehensively scrutinises official reports--showing the many flaws, inaccuracies and omissions, while presenting a more plausible hypothesis. All such findings are still consistently ignored by both government investigations and the mainstream media... Why?
Loose Change is a series of films that present evidence that the September 11, 2001 attacks were planned and conducted by elements of the United States government. The series also examines anomalies in the historical record of the attacks while drawing comparisons from some of the many mysterious and infamous other events that have reshaped world history, such as the Reichstag Fire in 1933 that catapulted Hitler to dictatorship and the Gulf of Tonkin Incident in 1964 that led to the Vietnam War...
9/11 Mysteries presents and analyses over 90 minutes of demolition evidence, laced with witness testimonials from key figures in the events of September 11th such as William Rodriguez -- a janitor from the North Tower of the World Trade Centre who was inside during the attacks. Moving from the myth through to analysis and into a discussion of the players, careful deconstruction of the official story is set alongside clear physics. How do you turn a 110-story building to dust in under ten seconds?
9/11 In Plane Sight examines a barrage of news clips from a majority of the mainstream news outlets -- the official story that was told on live TV by reporters, policemen, fire-fighters, and other on-the-scene eyewitnesses, only to be never repeated. The stories changed, information was enigmatically omitted, and what can only be described as officially prescribed propaganda took the place of indisputable reality. This film asks a series of leading questions about the events of September 11th 2001 and what you were told...
Michael Ruppert not only names Dick Cheney as the prime suspect in the mass murders of September 11 and states that not only was he a planner in the attacks, but also that on the day of the attacks he was running a completely separate Command, Control and Communications system which was superseding any orders being issued by the NMCC (the National Military Command Centre), or the White House 'Situation Room'...
To this day, questions remain about what really happened in New York and Washington DC on 11th September 2001. All over the world and over a decade later, people still question the official story and the veracity of the explanations given for the events that took place that day. The Sensible Doubt meets with 6 Danes who talk about their doubt and scepticism of the official story espoused by the United States government and global mainstream media, and how they've come to their conclusions...
How does a Boeing 757, constructed from lightweight aluminium, penetrate over 9 ft. of steel reinforced concrete? Why was the public never shown the video and photographs of the Pentagon before the outer wall had collapsed showing only one 16 ft. hole? Furthermore, how does an airplane of that size fit into the small hole of the Pentagon as shown in close-up photographic evidence? What really hit the Pentagon?
In 9/11 Eyewitness, Rick Siegel captures the raw events of September 11, 2001 from the view of the Hoboken pier and then goes on to present a scientific analysis of the footage from that day. The raw footage, eyewitness testimony and scientific analysis of the collapse of the Twin Towers and World Trade Center Building 7, bring considerable doubt to the 'Offical Story' spouted by the government and the mainstream media...
Fabled Enemies examines the US government's intelligence apparatus and its involvement in the events of September 11, 2001. Many questions surround the proceedings of that day. What were the precise actions of a shadow government operating in an underground bunker with Dick Cheney? Why did the FBI have their investigations into Bin Laden obstructed and shut down by George Bush before the attacks? Were the alledged hijackers trained at US military bases? Why was the military running exactly the same situation as 'war games' at exactly the same time of the attack?
On September 11, 2001 and for approximately nineteen years prior, William Rodriguez was employed as a maintenance worker at the World Trade Center. On the day of the attacks, Rodriguez initially rescued fifteen persons from the World Trade Center, and as the only person at the site with the master key to the North Tower stairwells, he led fire-fighters up the towers unlocking doors, aiding in the successful evacuation of unknown hundreds of those who survived. This is the account of his version of events...
Hijacking Catastrophe examines the evidence that neoconservatives used the September 11, 2001 attacks to usher in a new doctrine of expanding American power through military force under the guise of a "war on terror" and that the doctrine -- known as the Project for the New American Century -- had been laid out prior to 9/11 by its authors, which include Dick Cheney, Paul Wolfowitz, Donald Rumsfeld, Jeb Bush and Dan Quayle...
9/11 -- Birth Of Treason provides an analysis of the attacks of September 11 2001. Amongst interviews and exchanges, Steven Jones and Kevin Ryan of Scholars for 9/11 Truth and Justice speak about their research. Examined is the phenomenon of the freefall-speed collapse of the towers and building 7, and Steven Jones' research into Thermite/Thermate explosives...
There is an abundance of scientific and forensic evidence to support alternative theories of what happened on September 11, 2001 -- yet the BBC and other mainstream news corporations continue to dismiss the information. The BBC in particular has failed to objectively present the detail of this evidence in the UK. 9/11 and the British Broadcasting Conspiracy is a documentary about this selective and distorted coverage by the BBC, with particular reference to the 'Conspiracy Files' programme aired on the BBC on February 18th 2007...