Topic false flag
In 1990, alarming evidence of NATO-sponsored terrorist attacks came to light. NATO’s secret "stay behind" armies that were set up across Western Europe after the Second World War were supposedly intended to help put together a resistance if the Soviet Union invaded. However, they went on to commit terrorist attacks against their own populations, so as to influence domestic politics and still exist post-Cold War. This film is the shocking story of Operation Gladio--a tale of espionage, conspiracy and political violence carried out by the United States.
We is a visual essay exploring the politics of empire, war, corporate globalisation, imperialism and history; using the words of Indian author and political activist Arundhati Roy, from her speech Come September given in Santa Fe, New Mexico one year after the September 11th attacks--not long after the invasion of Afghanistan. The result is a mix of archive footage illustrating specific historical events throughout South America, the Middle East and elsewhere, in context with the September 11th attacks; placed alongside the themes of empire, global economics and a short history of neo-collonialism...
9/11 -- Beyond A Reasonable Doubt provides a summary of evidence from various sources against the official account of what happened on September 11, 2001. The film is assembled using clips from several other documentaries, news reels and archive footage to provide an example of the overwhelming evidence that contradicts statements made by official sources.
Fool Me Twice documents the Australian government's lies about the East Timor massacres, the cover-up of the Bali bombings (including the 1993 World Trade Centre attack) and subsequent anti-terror legislation forced through parliament by the Howard government. Laws that are still in effect today...
In 2005, a physics professor named Steven Jones published a paper of a scientific hypothesis regarding the free-fall speed collapse of 3 buildings on September 11, 2001--the twin towers, and the collapse of World Trade Center building 7 which was not hit by a plane. He proposed based on obvious observations of the collapse, alongside direct evidence of the use of incendiaries, that the only way for all buildings to have collapsed the way they did was in a controlled demolition of some kind. Faced with scientific evidence challenging official reports, what ensued was a firestorm--Jones received hate mail, threats, muddled media attention, and even offers of bribes to stop his research. Why was this information so thoroughly resisted? And why such scientific evidence ignored and further inquiry suppressed?
The Australian Federal Police -- the glamour police force that was set-up after the Sydney Hilton Hotel Bombing in 1978 -- has enjoyed consistent showers of praise by politicians and the public ever since it's inception. However, the once-lionised AFP is now being ridiculed for bungling, excessive secrecy and collusion after the "catastrophic failings" of the "terrorism case" against Dr Mohammed Haneef. But the Haneef case is just a symptom of the "deep cultural problems that beset the AFP"...
In March 2003 thousands of Australian troops and others were committed to fight a 'war' as part of a pre-emptive strike on the sovereign nation of Iraq, a country from whom there was no threat. Two years on, Australia has suffered its first casualty in the conflict while the American death toll stands at nearly two thousand, a result of an invasion which has all but destroyed a foreign nation and seen an estimated 100,000 of its civilians killed, millions made homeless, leaving a legacy of destruction and religious division instilled in its wake. Did Australia get it wrong? How could our Government have made such a catastrophic and historic 'error'?
Improbable Collapse focuses on the events of September 11, 2001 from a scientific perspective--testing various hypotheses against gathered evidence such as traces of incendiary particles in dust found after the attacks; the presence of molten-metal being found in all 3 buildings (WTC 1, 2, and 7) and other physical evidence such as the collapse of all 3 buildings at free-fall speed that would suggest that they were destroyed using explosives in a controlled demolition--especially building 7 which was not hit by a plane and collapsed neatly in it's own footprint at 5:21pm. Using photographs, extensive video footage as well as thorough scientific analysis, the film comprehensively scrutinises official reports--showing the many flaws, inaccuracies and omissions, while presenting a more plausible hypothesis. All such findings are still consistently ignored by both government investigations and the mainstream media... Why?
The discrepancies between the "war on terror" and the facts on the ground in Afghanistan and Iraq are many. In 2001, as the bombs began to drop, George W. Bush promised Afghanistan "the generosity of America and its allies". Now, the familiar old warlords are retaining their power, religious fundamentalism is expanding its grip and military "skirmishes" continue routinely. In "liberated" Afghanistan, America has its military base and pipeline access, while the people have the warlords who are, as one woman says in the film, "in many ways worse than the Taliban" -- which, after all, is funded by the United States, remember?
Loose Change is a series of films that present evidence that the September 11, 2001 attacks were planned and conducted by elements of the United States government. The series also examines anomalies in the historical record of the attacks while drawing comparisons from some of the many mysterious and infamous other events that have reshaped world history, such as the Reichstag Fire in 1933 that catapulted Hitler to dictatorship and the Gulf of Tonkin Incident in 1964 that led to the Vietnam War...
9/11 Mysteries presents and analyses over 90 minutes of demolition evidence, laced with witness testimonials from key figures in the events of September 11th such as William Rodriguez -- a janitor from the North Tower of the World Trade Centre who was inside during the attacks. Moving from the myth through to analysis and into a discussion of the players, careful deconstruction of the official story is set alongside clear physics. How do you turn a 110-story building to dust in under ten seconds?
In 1978, Australia was shocked by the explosion of a massive bomb placed in a rubbish bin outside the Sydney Hilton Hotel in NSW. The perpetrators were never found. However, evidence that the Australian security and intelligence forces may have been responsible resulted in the NSW State Parliament unanimously calling for an inquiry in 1991 and then again in 1995. The Federal Government vetoed any inquiry. No investigation was held. The government then set-up the Australian Federal Police and increased support for "anti-terrorist measures"...
9/11 In Plane Sight examines a barrage of news clips from a majority of the mainstream news outlets -- the official story that was told on live TV by reporters, policemen, fire-fighters, and other on-the-scene eyewitnesses, only to be never repeated. The stories changed, information was enigmatically omitted, and what can only be described as officially prescribed propaganda took the place of indisputable reality. This film asks a series of leading questions about the events of September 11th 2001 and what you were told...
Michael Ruppert not only names Dick Cheney as the prime suspect in the mass murders of September 11 and states that not only was he a planner in the attacks, but also that on the day of the attacks he was running a completely separate Command, Control and Communications system which was superseding any orders being issued by the NMCC (the National Military Command Centre), or the White House 'Situation Room'...
Mind The Gap documents an investigation into several false leads surrounding the official account by the UK government of the London Bombings on 7th July 2005. The film follows numerous stories reported in the media to which the police have given information which has later turned out to be false. The film also details many other aspects of the official account that raise questions such as the circumstances surrounding forensics, information regarding explosives, police and DNA and the "strange disappearance" of CCTV and eyewitness evidence...
To this day, questions remain about what really happened in New York and Washington DC on 11th September 2001. All over the world and over a decade later, people still question the official story and the veracity of the explanations given for the events that took place that day. The Sensible Doubt meets with 6 Danes who talk about their doubt and scepticism of the official story espoused by the United States government and global mainstream media, and how they've come to their conclusions...
7/7 Ripple Effect disputes the official account of the London bombings (also known as 7/7) -- an alleged terrorist attack on public transport in Central London on the 7th July 2005. The film questions the official account of what happened on the day of the attacks, implicating the Metropolitan Police; claiming that the true perpetrators of the attacks were MI5 and the Mossad...
How does a Boeing 757, constructed from lightweight aluminium, penetrate over 9 ft. of steel reinforced concrete? Why was the public never shown the video and photographs of the Pentagon before the outer wall had collapsed showing only one 16 ft. hole? Furthermore, how does an airplane of that size fit into the small hole of the Pentagon as shown in close-up photographic evidence? What really hit the Pentagon?
In 9/11 Eyewitness, Rick Siegel captures the raw events of September 11, 2001 from the view of the Hoboken pier and then goes on to present a scientific analysis of the footage from that day. The raw footage, eyewitness testimony and scientific analysis of the collapse of the Twin Towers and World Trade Center Building 7, bring considerable doubt to the 'Offical Story' spouted by the government and the mainstream media...
Fabled Enemies examines the US government's intelligence apparatus and its involvement in the events of September 11, 2001. Many questions surround the proceedings of that day. What were the precise actions of a shadow government operating in an underground bunker with Dick Cheney? Why did the FBI have their investigations into Bin Laden obstructed and shut down by George Bush before the attacks? Were the alledged hijackers trained at US military bases? Why was the military running exactly the same situation as 'war games' at exactly the same time of the attack?
9/11 -- Birth Of Treason provides an analysis of the attacks of September 11 2001. Amongst interviews and exchanges, Steven Jones and Kevin Ryan of Scholars for 9/11 Truth and Justice speak about their research. Examined is the phenomenon of the freefall-speed collapse of the towers and building 7, and Steven Jones' research into Thermite/Thermate explosives...
There is an abundance of scientific and forensic evidence to support alternative theories of what happened on September 11, 2001 -- yet the BBC and other mainstream news corporations continue to dismiss the information. The BBC in particular has failed to objectively present the detail of this evidence in the UK. 9/11 and the British Broadcasting Conspiracy is a documentary about this selective and distorted coverage by the BBC, with particular reference to the 'Conspiracy Files' programme aired on the BBC on February 18th 2007...